To
be happy, can not be on top of our wish list, but none of us wants to be sad.
Although
only a few people came to the correct fusion of words to describe what it is
that everyone is familiar with happiness. Happiness
is a fundamental and inalienable right of man, and all the materialistic and
scientific developments should make man happy. Unfortunately,
the relationship between income growth and the level of happiness was the
opposite result. Affected
by this recession, the blue world, how an offer to buy happiness, they are sold
in the supermarket next door?
Karl Rabeder, an Austrian businessman of 47 years, decided to buy it for £3 million his entire fortune! After more than two decades of his life to make money, then he found that he could not make her happy. Therefore, he decided to sell his 3455-square-foot luxury villa, cottage, business and finance all their possessions to charity established in countries of South America. Finally, Mr. Rabeder should be left with nothing, and live in a log cabin. Thus, Mr. Rabeder thought embrace true happiness! Most of us have trouble agreeing with this idea, but Mr. Rabeder bet your bottom dollar!
This has left some people make money to be happy, confused and perplexed. Happily in the right place at the right wish list, you have to wonder why you are not happy after their bank accounts filled with money and decorate your home with possessions. What is the grueling hard work and why they work like dogs?
Indeed, if happiness was something tangible that can be stored in tanks and sold on the market, then you could buy at Wal-Mart or Carrefour, but is intangible, a feeling that there is no agreed definition . People from different walks of life to see otherwise. In simple terms, it is the feeling and mood characterized by emotions ranging from joy to joy, but a philosopher and religious scholar will not find the same thing. Psychologist, come with a different set of technical terms and an economist looking for support from totally different jargon to describe their views. Ask the man on the street and he will tell you that happiness is not something that defines who is facing. However, if happiness was to be sold on the market at a price not resist allowed to buy?The purchasing power of money is well established. Is the power of plastic or paper also bring happiness to renounce sovereignty in his royal court?
Happiness lies not in plastic or paper, considered money, but their purchasing power. We live in a consumer society where we are bombarded with advertisements nonstop, prepared by qualified professionals trained and traders convince us that we have a lot of modern things to make us happy. Do not lie to us. New things that really make us happy, but that feeling of happiness is short-lived. Once you buy what our ideal start looking after our happiness provider."For a long time,'' said Mr. Rabeder" I think that more wealth and luxury automatically meant more happiness. "After the acquisition of a lot of unnecessary waste, its performance was impressive." I had the feeling I was working as a slave for things they do not want or need. "Therefore, decided to give their money to those who really need it.
Recent research supports the view of Mr. Rabeder that happiness has nothing to do with personal expenses. Elizabeth Dunn, a psychologist at the University of British Columbia, and colleagues surveyed a representative sample of more than 630 Americans, divided equally between men and women. The participants expressed their happiness income, the distribution of annual and monthly costs, including invoices, purchase for themselves and for others and donations to charity. Statistical analyzes confirmed that staff costs had nothing to do with happiness.
"Whatever the amount of income each person made," said Dunn, "those who spent money on others reported greater happiness, while those who spent more on themselves n ' not. "This is something different religions have advised their followers to do for centuries.
The concept of giving to the poor, feed the hungry, clothe the naked, and to help those in need is not new. Almost all religions advises his disciples to practice these noble deeds. In return, followers or believers are promised certain spiritual statements. However, the fact happen to others is not limited only to believers. Even non-believers feel happy to help others, even if there are people who do not help their fellow man, because I believe that each person should take care of your needs yourself. They believe that their negligence and laziness should not be paid for the hard work of others. Some people also admit that spending on other members of the world, its animals and plants, etc., is a source of happiness extraction, and experience has donated to charities working for the well-being animals or the planet.
However, the link between the act of giving and being happy is not easy to discover. The action may otherwise give take or collect things. Where does it lead? You can increase the number of possessions increase our sense of happiness?
Follow this question upside down and you will find the paradox. Everything we do we seem to possess. Global property relationship may seem biased, but in reality it is not. The object belongs to us is also the owner. If the car is stolen and used to commit a crime, I can vouch for him to the police. Therefore, the nature of this relationship is reciprocal. Each object requires that we have a relative amount of responsibility that takes its share of our freedom. As many of our possessions increases, the degree of our liberty decreases. As we have absorbed and trapped in a world, we become slaves of the world and the system of things. How a slave who is deprived of all their rights and freedoms, be a happy person?
The problem can not be property, but to the misperception of it. When talking about our life partners, for example, say "my wife" or "my husband." This is where another paradox. My wife really mine? If it is really mine then nothing, not even death, can not depart from me, but it happens. People are in love, marry, and then the day comes when they say "goodbye" to others. Although married, you can say "wife" or "husband", but in real terms, it simply means that your partner is with us for a certain period of time, during which he or she has her own individuality and personality. So, my wife can not be completely and forever mine. The same applies to other things of the earth. We also extend the concept of property and set ourselves the unnecessary things and invisible links that steal our freedom.
By giving, we can deduce that actually lighten our burdens. Material things beset us. They add extra stress. Give him bridging the gap pressure and allows great freedom, so we gain happiness. Karl Rabeder observed the same thing. When asked how he felt after his decision, he replied: "I am the light, the opposite of heavy"
We can be happy with what we have. We have very little, in fact, to make us happy, because it comes from within, and it actually costs us nothing. What we seek can never make us happy. As the gap between what we have and what we have expanded, so that increases the amount of our suffering. We try to be happy with the simple things in life, and ease our minds loading.
The money that we can help buy happiness, but not the same way we buy things tangible. What we must understand is that happiness helps attract an indirect way. If our spending contributes to the ease and happiness to others, it helps to increase our level of happiness. So, instead of accumulating happiness lies in spending and share them with others.
Karl Rabeder, an Austrian businessman of 47 years, decided to buy it for £3 million his entire fortune! After more than two decades of his life to make money, then he found that he could not make her happy. Therefore, he decided to sell his 3455-square-foot luxury villa, cottage, business and finance all their possessions to charity established in countries of South America. Finally, Mr. Rabeder should be left with nothing, and live in a log cabin. Thus, Mr. Rabeder thought embrace true happiness! Most of us have trouble agreeing with this idea, but Mr. Rabeder bet your bottom dollar!
This has left some people make money to be happy, confused and perplexed. Happily in the right place at the right wish list, you have to wonder why you are not happy after their bank accounts filled with money and decorate your home with possessions. What is the grueling hard work and why they work like dogs?
Indeed, if happiness was something tangible that can be stored in tanks and sold on the market, then you could buy at Wal-Mart or Carrefour, but is intangible, a feeling that there is no agreed definition . People from different walks of life to see otherwise. In simple terms, it is the feeling and mood characterized by emotions ranging from joy to joy, but a philosopher and religious scholar will not find the same thing. Psychologist, come with a different set of technical terms and an economist looking for support from totally different jargon to describe their views. Ask the man on the street and he will tell you that happiness is not something that defines who is facing. However, if happiness was to be sold on the market at a price not resist allowed to buy?The purchasing power of money is well established. Is the power of plastic or paper also bring happiness to renounce sovereignty in his royal court?
Happiness lies not in plastic or paper, considered money, but their purchasing power. We live in a consumer society where we are bombarded with advertisements nonstop, prepared by qualified professionals trained and traders convince us that we have a lot of modern things to make us happy. Do not lie to us. New things that really make us happy, but that feeling of happiness is short-lived. Once you buy what our ideal start looking after our happiness provider."For a long time,'' said Mr. Rabeder" I think that more wealth and luxury automatically meant more happiness. "After the acquisition of a lot of unnecessary waste, its performance was impressive." I had the feeling I was working as a slave for things they do not want or need. "Therefore, decided to give their money to those who really need it.
Recent research supports the view of Mr. Rabeder that happiness has nothing to do with personal expenses. Elizabeth Dunn, a psychologist at the University of British Columbia, and colleagues surveyed a representative sample of more than 630 Americans, divided equally between men and women. The participants expressed their happiness income, the distribution of annual and monthly costs, including invoices, purchase for themselves and for others and donations to charity. Statistical analyzes confirmed that staff costs had nothing to do with happiness.
"Whatever the amount of income each person made," said Dunn, "those who spent money on others reported greater happiness, while those who spent more on themselves n ' not. "This is something different religions have advised their followers to do for centuries.
The concept of giving to the poor, feed the hungry, clothe the naked, and to help those in need is not new. Almost all religions advises his disciples to practice these noble deeds. In return, followers or believers are promised certain spiritual statements. However, the fact happen to others is not limited only to believers. Even non-believers feel happy to help others, even if there are people who do not help their fellow man, because I believe that each person should take care of your needs yourself. They believe that their negligence and laziness should not be paid for the hard work of others. Some people also admit that spending on other members of the world, its animals and plants, etc., is a source of happiness extraction, and experience has donated to charities working for the well-being animals or the planet.
However, the link between the act of giving and being happy is not easy to discover. The action may otherwise give take or collect things. Where does it lead? You can increase the number of possessions increase our sense of happiness?
Follow this question upside down and you will find the paradox. Everything we do we seem to possess. Global property relationship may seem biased, but in reality it is not. The object belongs to us is also the owner. If the car is stolen and used to commit a crime, I can vouch for him to the police. Therefore, the nature of this relationship is reciprocal. Each object requires that we have a relative amount of responsibility that takes its share of our freedom. As many of our possessions increases, the degree of our liberty decreases. As we have absorbed and trapped in a world, we become slaves of the world and the system of things. How a slave who is deprived of all their rights and freedoms, be a happy person?
The problem can not be property, but to the misperception of it. When talking about our life partners, for example, say "my wife" or "my husband." This is where another paradox. My wife really mine? If it is really mine then nothing, not even death, can not depart from me, but it happens. People are in love, marry, and then the day comes when they say "goodbye" to others. Although married, you can say "wife" or "husband", but in real terms, it simply means that your partner is with us for a certain period of time, during which he or she has her own individuality and personality. So, my wife can not be completely and forever mine. The same applies to other things of the earth. We also extend the concept of property and set ourselves the unnecessary things and invisible links that steal our freedom.
By giving, we can deduce that actually lighten our burdens. Material things beset us. They add extra stress. Give him bridging the gap pressure and allows great freedom, so we gain happiness. Karl Rabeder observed the same thing. When asked how he felt after his decision, he replied: "I am the light, the opposite of heavy"
We can be happy with what we have. We have very little, in fact, to make us happy, because it comes from within, and it actually costs us nothing. What we seek can never make us happy. As the gap between what we have and what we have expanded, so that increases the amount of our suffering. We try to be happy with the simple things in life, and ease our minds loading.
The money that we can help buy happiness, but not the same way we buy things tangible. What we must understand is that happiness helps attract an indirect way. If our spending contributes to the ease and happiness to others, it helps to increase our level of happiness. So, instead of accumulating happiness lies in spending and share them with others.
No comments:
Post a Comment